De unga utreder nu?

”I am a socialist.” – Hitler, from his ”Zweites Buch” (Second Book) Page 50.

Some continue to believe that Hitler and National Socialism wasn’t REAL (National) Socialism. Some believe that the totalitarian State of the Third Reich had no power at all, and that the market was ’free’. They want to believe that Hitler and his State had NO control over the economy, and that the ideology of National Socialism didn’t call for the creation of a ’People’s State’ after the conquest of Lebensraum. Yes, 80 years after the events in question, many are still pushing a contradictory narrative that directly goes against the colossal amount of evidence pointing towards the opposite conclusion, and then refuse to even consider the possibility that they might be wrong in their interpretation. Well today, we will walk through numerous primary and secondary sources, show the substantial amount of flaws in the denialist argument, and present a solid interpretation of the evidence that makes much more sense than the denialist argument ever has.

I am NOT a Fascist, NOT a National Socialist, and NOT a Marxist Socialist. And I am NOT promoting said ideologies. This video is discussing events or concepts that are academic, educational and historical in nature. This video is for informational purposes and was created so we may better understand the past and learn from the mistakes others have made.

Rainer Zitelmann’s ”Hitler’s National Socialism” is a republishing of his original ”Hitler: The Policies of Seduction” which I’ve been recommending for years. Finally, you can get your hands on what is in my opinion by far the best book assessing Hitler and his ideology.

Disclaimers: I’m NOT a Nazi, nor a Fascist, nor a Marxist, or a believer in any other ideology. The purpose of this video is to educate people and learn from history so that we don’t repeat the mistakes of the past.

This is NOT a sponsored video and I’m NOT making any commission by recommending this book. I am genuinely recommending this based on the fact that it has contributed significantly to the historiography surrounding this topic. I’ve used the first edition of this book for years now (since 2019 at least) and have been recommending it since then.